By: blogic Posted: Thursday, October 14, 2004 on The Tide Goes Out Message Board: Politics A moment where we learned something troubling about

it's that he belittles his opponent with showy antics, even when he has no idea if his opponent has actually made a mistake. He's done this same behavior in two debates. Once might have been an unpleasant aberration, but now we know this is an ugly part of Bush's fundamental character.

And Kerry doesn't do that? hmmmmm.

And quite possibly the end of Kerry:

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

DATE: 12 October 2004 CAMPAIGN UPDATE: The Petition for Indictment of John Kerry reached its target of 150,000 signatures in September. (This petition for indictment will remain online for informational purposes [see http://patriotpetitions.us/], and will accept additional signatures, which we will report each quarter after the petition for indictment is filed.) Dear Fellow Patriot, The petition for indictment of John Kerry, for "giving aid and comfort to the enemy," and, thus, to disqualify him for national office, has reached its goal of more than 150,000 signatures. On Monday, 18 October, the petition will be delivered by registered courier to Vice President Richard Cheney (in his capacity as Senate President), Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Attorney General John Ashcroft today. Though John Kerry has an extensive and well-documented record of anti- American activities over the past three decades [see "John Kerry: More aid and comfort..." at http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/], it is his acts of treason in 1970-71 that are the subject of this petition for indictment. Our appeal notes both Kerry's violations of the UCMJ (Article 104 part 904) and U.S. Code (18 USC Sec. 2381 and 18 USC Sec. 953), and calls for his disqualification for public office in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice- President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." Why prosecute John Kerry now? In October 2003, Mr. Kerry chose to make his Vietnam war record the centerpiece of his campaign for the presidency; this has been especially true since his primary victory in March 2004 [see "Kerry's Quagmire..." http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/]. In response, more than 165,000 signatories of the above-referenced petition for indictment have made his war record the centerpiece of their campaign to disqualify Kerry from public office. We understand that no action is likely to be taken on this petition until after the 02 November election. Be it known, however, that on 03 November, we will seek full recourse in an effort to have John Kerry prosecuted for acts of treason and disqualified from any future campaign for any national office. We are thus committed to holding Mr. Kerry accountable for his actions, as there is no statute of limitations for acts of treason. Thank you for taking the time to sign this petition for indictment. Rest assured that your voice will be heard. Semper Vigilo, Paratus, et Fidelis!

Bush is a lying fool. Eat your words Drmiller, because every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk and start calling people names, flapping your arms about and using mixed up thinking to try to prove to yourself that you are right.

Bush smirks and Kerry frowns ( or can he with that botox injection or did it wear off?)

- Grim X

HAHAHA, I didnt even read this. When I saw the title I made myself a bet that either blogic or T-bone posted this. Score one for me.

Speaking of Bush smirking and Kerry frowning, how about we see the pictures of the actual crimes that took place by the smirker and frowner.

I will try to look for some.

VERSUS

Smirk versus Smile

Reply #3 By: sandy2 - 10/14/2004 7:40:17 PM Bush is a lying fool. Eat your words Drmiller, because every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk and start calling people names, flapping your arms about and using mixed up thinking to try to prove to yourself that you are right.

You first.... reread my first lines:

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk

Sandy, you of all people have no right to say that. If drmiller does this for kerry, you do exactly the same thing for Bush.

If you watched last night, you know Bush made a show of the word "exaggeration," drawing out each syllable, while he grinned at the camera. Too bad Kerry was right.

Kerry was wrong, if you consider stretching the truth(streching a very long way) to be a lie. Kerry WAS greatly exaggerating the fact that Bush "wasn't worried" about Bin Laden. Kerry said this, of course, to scare the ignorant voters out there who probably think Bush and Bin Laden have reached some secret agreement. BUSH DIDNT LIE WHEN HE SAID KERRY WAS EXAGGERATING!!!

where he said to the moderator: "need wood?"

He actually said that while facing Kerry, as I recall, so I think the comment was directed at him.

The only part of your article worthy of a reply.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

Even if the petition gets action to be taken, how has Kerry commited Treason?

Sandy, you of all people have no right to say that. If drmiller does this for kerry, you do exactly the same thing for Bush.

I said that to Drmiller because in another post he called someone who had the same viewpoint as me a jerk. I said he acted like a jerk in doing so.

So it's down to this for you, blogic: Bush is uglier.

How sad.

Cheers,
Daiwa

This is so ignorant...

"I don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. That's kind of one of those exaggerations."

and he didn't, he said:

"I truly am not that concerned about him," ( bold for the BLIND, since I can't do braille for you... )

More blogic propaganda. Bush wasn't wrong, Kerry was wrong. Bush DIDN'T say he wasn't worried, he said he wasn't "that concerned", which, to anyone with a slight grasp of "Ingritch", means he is concerned, but not to an extreme degree.

How pathetic, how blatently fearful do you guys have to be to home in on this kind of thing? It isn't hard to belittle Kerry. By exageratting his importance and his contribution he belittles himself for anyone that looks at him objectively. He's whined about his epic four months in the jungle, misrepresented his position on two wars, done his best to side-step 20 years in the Senate as someone to the Left of The Chappaquiddick Kid, Ted Kennedy...

Come on. If this is the best you can do I'm not all that worried.